Professional statement · version 1.0
Objective Condition Grading of Used Electronics in the United States
An open request for the independent professional opinion of experts in measurement, refurbishment, procurement, and electronic waste.
The Problem Exists
The U.S. secondary market for used consumer electronics - tens of millions of devices each year - has no shared, objective, machine-produced way to grade device condition. Grading is performed by human inspectors whose judgment is inherently subjective, and different marketplaces use incompatible grade scales (for example, one seller's "Good" can mean something different from another's), so the same device can receive different grades depending on who lists it. The result is avoidable returns, depressed resale prices, and eroded buyer trust across the market.
Industry standards exist but do not close this gap. CTIA Wireless Device Grading is voluntary, applied by human judgment, and limited mainly to phones and tablets; it defines what a grade means without producing an objective grade, and no equivalent standard covers laptops and Chromebooks - the devices schools, colleges, and housing authorities most often buy. Other standards, including R2v3, e-Stewards, and NIST SP 800-88, govern data sanitization and environmental handling, not an objective measure of a device's cosmetic and functional condition.
Consequences:
- Institutions such as schools, libraries, nonprofits, and housing authorities cannot independently verify the condition, or the data sanitization, of the refurbished devices they purchase.
- The 2024 collapse of the Affordable Connectivity Program and the 2025 termination of the Digital Equity Act shifted the burden of supplying affordable, trustworthy devices onto schools, colleges, and nonprofits, increasing demand while the verification problem remains unresolved.
- The income-based digital divide persists: only about 54% of adults in households earning under $30,000 have home broadband, compared with 94% in the highest-income households.
- Usable devices are recycled or discarded instead of reused. Global electronic waste reached a record approximately 62 million tonnes in 2022, with only about 22% formally collected and recycled, and there is no federal U.S. standard requiring consumer-electronics recycling.
- The United States is roughly 80% net-import reliant on rare-earth minerals, many of which are embedded in discarded devices; extending device life and improving reuse helps keep these materials in circulation longer.
What We Are Solving - The Wear Index
The Wear Index is a proposed method for objective, machine-produced, and auditable condition grading. It uses controlled imaging and computer vision to produce a repeatable grade, with a documented condition record for each device.
Its specification is openly published for independent review as a working paper, version 0.1, dated 5 July 2026, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21205949. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 64/075,243.
Potential Broader Benefits
If validated and adopted, an objective and auditable grading approach could:
- improve procurement confidence for institutions,
- increase device reuse and support the circular economy,
- reduce electronic waste and support materials recovery,
- expand access to affordable, reliable devices.
What Your Response Means
Endorsing reflects your independent professional view that the problem is real and significant, and that an objective, auditable grading approach of this kind merits development. It is not a legal opinion, not a product endorsement, and not a commercial commitment.
Fingerprint of this statement version
SHA-256
a6c9c8af c959ef2a d62be144 e42c0e2a 6900081b afa51f99 7ff94be6 b119c439
Every response is stored against this version and fingerprint, so there is never any doubt about which wording was signed.
Your Professional Opinion
Please answer in your own words. Endorsing, endorsing with reservations, and declining are all recorded and reported the same way.